News > Digital
SaveE-mailPrintMost PopularRSSReprints

Social Net Ads: Fewer Clicks, More Engagement

Sept 28, 2009

- Brian Morrissey


adweek/photos/stylus/107413-MouseL.jpg
NEW YORK Conventional wisdom holds that social media advertising does not perform nearly as well as ads running on non-social sites, at least by standard measurements like clicks.
 
That's true, according to a new study by social ad network Lotame, but it misses an important distinction: the same ad placements on social sites can draw far higher levels of engagement. And that's an increasingly important point for brands.
 
Lotame examined over 100 rich-media campaigns it ran during 2008 and the first eight months of this year on sites like Bebo, Flixster and The Huffington Post. It compared the performance of those campaigns in aggregate to the industry standard measurements published by Google ad serving unit DoubleClick.
 
It found that click-through rates for ads on social sites were lower than the DoubleClick average across all ad sizes, formats and types of advertiser.

The good news for social sites: While users are unlikely to leave the site and visit advertisers' venues, they are more likely to interact with some aspect of ads. Such interaction can include playing videos or expanding the ad messages on-screen. For example, the completion rate for in-page videos was 68 percent on Lotame compared to 62 percent in the DoubleClick sample. Expandable video units showed similar results.
 
The differences were more apparent in interaction rates. Lotame's figures showed double response rates in expandable units, both with video and without, and for in-page video.
 
"It's a difference in the way users in that space interact with ads," said Lotame CEO Andy Monfried. "It's weird to assume they're not interested in ads because they're on social media sites. Advertisers need to treat social media in a different fashion from other forms of online media."
 
Lotame sells ads based on time exposed rather than impressions or clicks, the standard industry measurements.
 
"We think there's a different metric needed both to monetize social media and target the user," he said.
 
Monfried is not alone in his contention that current modes of measuring online ads fall short, particularly in social media, where users are spending lots of time. Companies like Videoegg are pushing a cost-per-engagement model and Betawave touts time as a measure of attention. Even former Internet Advertising Bureau chairman and CNET founder Shelby Bonnie lamented the state of metrics in a recent blog post that called for the industry to "kill the CPM."
 
Lotame's sample doesn't include the Web's largest social sites, notably Facebook. Mike Murphy, Facebook's vp, global media sales, declined to detail the engagement rates that site has seen for advertising, but said they were "significantly higher" than industry averages. (Facebook sells "engagement ads" that appear within its stream of content and off to the side. Microsoft handles sales of its standard banner units.) Facebook has now run campaigns for 83 of the top 100 advertisers, he said.

See also: "Facebook's Mike Murphy on Friending Brands"


Social Net Ads: Fewer Clicks, More Engagement

Sept 28, 2009

- Brian Morrissey


adweek/photos/stylus/107413-MouseL.jpg

NEW YORK Conventional wisdom holds that social media advertising does not perform nearly as well as ads running on non-social sites, at least by standard measurements like clicks.
 
That's true, according to a new study by social ad network Lotame, but it misses an important distinction: the same ad placements on social sites can draw far higher levels of engagement. And that's an increasingly important point for brands.
 
Lotame examined over 100 rich-media campaigns it ran during 2008 and the first eight months of this year on sites like Bebo, Flixster and The Huffington Post. It compared the performance of those campaigns in aggregate to the industry standard measurements published by Google ad serving unit DoubleClick.
 
It found that click-through rates for ads on social sites were lower than the DoubleClick average across all ad sizes, formats and types of advertiser.

The good news for social sites: While users are unlikely to leave the site and visit advertisers' venues, they are more likely to interact with some aspect of ads. Such interaction can include playing videos or expanding the ad messages on-screen. For example, the completion rate for in-page videos was 68 percent on Lotame compared to 62 percent in the DoubleClick sample. Expandable video units showed similar results.
 
The differences were more apparent in interaction rates. Lotame's figures showed double response rates in expandable units, both with video and without, and for in-page video.
 
"It's a difference in the way users in that space interact with ads," said Lotame CEO Andy Monfried. "It's weird to assume they're not interested in ads because they're on social media sites. Advertisers need to treat social media in a different fashion from other forms of online media."
 
Lotame sells ads based on time exposed rather than impressions or clicks, the standard industry measurements.
 
"We think there's a different metric needed both to monetize social media and target the user," he said.
 
Monfried is not alone in his contention that current modes of measuring online ads fall short, particularly in social media, where users are spending lots of time. Companies like Videoegg are pushing a cost-per-engagement model and Betawave touts time as a measure of attention. Even former Internet Advertising Bureau chairman and CNET founder Shelby Bonnie lamented the state of metrics in a recent blog post that called for the industry to "kill the CPM."
 
Lotame's sample doesn't include the Web's largest social sites, notably Facebook. Mike Murphy, Facebook's vp, global media sales, declined to detail the engagement rates that site has seen for advertising, but said they were "significantly higher" than industry averages. (Facebook sells "engagement ads" that appear within its stream of content and off to the side. Microsoft handles sales of its standard banner units.) Facebook has now run campaigns for 83 of the top 100 advertisers, he said.

See also: "Facebook's Mike Murphy on Friending Brands"
Post a Comment
Asterisk (*) is a required field.
* Author:
* Comment:
 
The opinions expressed in comments are those of the individual poster. They do not necessarily reflect the views of Adweek or Nielsen Business Media. Attacks of a personal nature and comments that are otherwise inappropriate may be removed.

Other Digital News

social

Social Media Users Really Are More Social

November 20, 2009

Facebook friendships may improve real friendships, according to new research. Findings released in a Euro RSCG-commissioned white paper yesterday stated that 27.6 percent of American social media users said that their offline relationships are actually benefiting from online interaction via social media. The study revealed that social media tools now play a key role in keeping consumers connected. Read Full Article



Our ProductsOur Products

ADWEEK DIGITAL DAILY

A morning briefing of most important interactive news stories.

SUBSCRIBE

Stay connected to what's happening in the advertising industry with delivery of the print edition and complete online access.

More VideosVideo






Adweek Advertising Home | Advertising Industry News | Creative TV Advertising | Advertising Industry Community | Video Advertising | Advertising Data Center | Advertising Special Reports | Advertising Careers | Advertising Products | Advertising About Us | Advertising Business Statements | Advertising Contact Us | Advertising Opportunities | Ad Licensing | Advertiser FAQ | Advertising Magazine Subscriptions | Subscriber FAQs | Advertising News RSS | Online Ad Site Map | Mobile

© 2009 Nielsen Business Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms of Use  |   Privacy Policy