News > Client
SaveE-mailPrintMost PopularRSSReprints

FDA: Diet Coke Plus in Violation

Regulators say the brand runs afoul of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act

Dec 24, 2008

- Kenneth Hein, Brandweek


NEW YORK While Diet Coke Plus is an oft-overlooked brand within Coca-Cola’s vast portfolio of beverages, the Food and Drug Administration is keeping a close on eye on it.

The Food and Drug Administration issued a letter to Coke CEO Muhtar Kent earlier this month, stating that the brand’s nutrient claims are in violation of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.

Diet Coke Plus was launched in 2006 as “a good source of vitamins B3, B6 and B12, and the minerals zinc and magnesium,” per company press materials.

The letter asserts that the product is “misbranded” because it “bears the nutrient content claim ‘plus’ but does not comply with the regulations governing the use of this claim.”

Coke rep Scott Williamson said, “We take seriously the issues raised by the FDA in its letter.  This does not involve any health or safety issues, and we believe the label on Diet Coke Plus complies with FDA's policies and regulations.  We will provide a detailed response to the FDA in early January." 

The letter adds: “The FDA does not consider it appropriate to fortify snack foods such as carbonated beverages.” Additionally, it said the product does not state the identity of a “reference food and the percentage” thus it fails to meet the requirements for adding a “plus” claim.

The FDA’s claims are “absolutely ridiculous,” said Bill Sipper, senior partner at Cascadia Consulting, a food and beverage consultancy based in Ramsey, N.J. “They should worry about tracking our beef supply versus tracking the word ‘plus’…Nobody really thinks they are getting their vitamins from Diet Coke.”

Gerry Khermouch, editor of Beverage Business Insights, applauded the FDA: "It's somewhat reassuring that some of these claims are being more vigorously questioned, with surely more of that to come under the expected new stewardship of the agency in the Obama administration. And it could have the beneficial side effect of encouraging the beverage companies to pursue more genuine innovation rather than cynical, and obvious, line extensions."

Coke spent $16 million, per Nielsen Monitor-Plus, to support Diet Coke Plus last year under the tagline “Great taste has its benefits." It has since shifted its focus to other brands like the successful Coke Zero and the enhanced water brand Vitaminwater. “When Coke Zero took off, they began to ignore things like Diet Coke Plus,” said Sipper. It spent a total of $8 million behind the small brand this year.


FDA: Diet Coke Plus in Violation

Regulators say the brand runs afoul of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act

Dec 24, 2008

- Kenneth Hein, Brandweek


NEW YORK While Diet Coke Plus is an oft-overlooked brand within Coca-Cola’s vast portfolio of beverages, the Food and Drug Administration is keeping a close on eye on it.

The Food and Drug Administration issued a letter to Coke CEO Muhtar Kent earlier this month, stating that the brand’s nutrient claims are in violation of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.

Diet Coke Plus was launched in 2006 as “a good source of vitamins B3, B6 and B12, and the minerals zinc and magnesium,” per company press materials.

The letter asserts that the product is “misbranded” because it “bears the nutrient content claim ‘plus’ but does not comply with the regulations governing the use of this claim.”

Coke rep Scott Williamson said, “We take seriously the issues raised by the FDA in its letter.  This does not involve any health or safety issues, and we believe the label on Diet Coke Plus complies with FDA's policies and regulations.  We will provide a detailed response to the FDA in early January." 

The letter adds: “The FDA does not consider it appropriate to fortify snack foods such as carbonated beverages.” Additionally, it said the product does not state the identity of a “reference food and the percentage” thus it fails to meet the requirements for adding a “plus” claim.

The FDA’s claims are “absolutely ridiculous,” said Bill Sipper, senior partner at Cascadia Consulting, a food and beverage consultancy based in Ramsey, N.J. “They should worry about tracking our beef supply versus tracking the word ‘plus’…Nobody really thinks they are getting their vitamins from Diet Coke.”

Gerry Khermouch, editor of Beverage Business Insights, applauded the FDA: "It's somewhat reassuring that some of these claims are being more vigorously questioned, with surely more of that to come under the expected new stewardship of the agency in the Obama administration. And it could have the beneficial side effect of encouraging the beverage companies to pursue more genuine innovation rather than cynical, and obvious, line extensions."

Coke spent $16 million, per Nielsen Monitor-Plus, to support Diet Coke Plus last year under the tagline “Great taste has its benefits." It has since shifted its focus to other brands like the successful Coke Zero and the enhanced water brand Vitaminwater. “When Coke Zero took off, they began to ignore things like Diet Coke Plus,” said Sipper. It spent a total of $8 million behind the small brand this year.


Post a Comment
Asterisk (*) is a required field.
* Author:
* Comment:
 
The opinions expressed in comments are those of the individual poster. They do not necessarily reflect the views of Adweek or Nielsen Business Media. Attacks of a personal nature and comments that are otherwise inappropriate may be removed.

Other Client News

unilever

Unilever's CMO to Step Down

February 09, 2010

Simon Clift is stepping down as chief marketing officer of Unilever in the next few months, the company has confirmed. Read Full Article



Our ProductsOur Products

ADWEEK DAILY UPDATE

Receive a comprehensive roundup of the biggest stories of the day.

BREAKING NEWS ALERTS

Sign up to be the first to hear about the biggest breaking news stories.

SUBSCRIBE

Stay connected to what's happening in the advertising industry with delivery of the print edition and complete online access.

More VideosVideo





Adweek Advertising Home | Advertising Industry News | Creative TV Advertising | Advertising Industry Community | Video Advertising | Advertising Data Center | Advertising Special Reports | Advertising Careers | Advertising Products | Advertising About Us | Advertising Business Statements | Advertising Contact Us | Advertising Opportunities | Ad Licensing | Advertiser FAQ | Advertising Magazine Subscriptions | Advertising News RSS | Online Ad Site Map | Mobile

© 2010 Adweek. All rights reserved. Terms of Use  |   Privacy Policy