Hallmark Says Leo Choice Wasn't All About Money

Inspiration meets innovation at Brandweek, the ultimate marketing experience. Join industry luminaries, rising talent and strategic experts in Phoenix, Arizona this September 23–26 to assess challenges, develop solutions and create new pathways for growth. Register early to save.

Cost-savings played a role in Hallmark’s decision last week to consolidate its advertising at Leo Burnett, but a representative of the greeting card company said economics wasn’t the main factor.

“We were looking for additional input, and that precipitated the review,” said company representative Julie O’Dell. Saving money by consolidating at Burnett “wasn’t a No. 1 consideration.”

Burnett, which handles Hallmark’s $90 million consumer advertising account, added the client’s retail and trade advertising account following a review that included the incumbent for the retail and trade business, Valentine Radford, along with Barkley Evergreen & Partners and Bernstein-Rein Advertising, all three of which are based in the company’s hometown of Kansas City, Mo.

Hallmark’s trade account could take on more importance as its contract with Kmart is set to expire June 1.





AW+

WORK SMARTER - LEARN, GROW AND BE INSPIRED.

Subscribe today!

To Read the Full Story Become an Adweek+ Subscriber

View Subscription Options

Already a member? Sign in