Pioneer Press Union Chooses Pay Cuts Over Job Cuts

The union representing staffers at The Pioneer Press in St. Paul, Minn. is backed into a tough corner: their owner, Media News Group, has been pushing for pay cuts for several months now, and finally demanded that the union take their offer, or face the immediate firing of 25 to 26 employees.

Luckily, the Pioneer Press Newspaper Guild (which represents employees in the editorial, advertising, and distribution departments) has come up with a counter-agreement that involves a slicing of the workweek to compensate for the pay cut. In a memo circulated yesterday, the union stated, “Adding it up, we will be taking home 9 to 10 percent less this year than called for in the contract. But it’s also true that we will be working 8 percent fewer hours.”

Though the deal will not be ushered into practice until ratified by union members, union leaders claim it “is the best — or the least bad — option” from their list of alternatives.

Official memo from the union, via MinnPost, after the jump.

Read More: Tentative deal: Pioneer Press workers trade pay cuts for layoff ban –MinnPost

Guild negotiators, Pioneer Press reach tentative agreement on contract modifications

Two days of difficult negotiations between the company and Guild negotiators have resulted in a tentative agreement to modify our contract. It includes painful cuts but is coupled with job protection — a reasonable tradeoff at a time when our newspaper, like the entire industry, faces daunting financial challenges. We did our best to mitigate harm while protecting jobs.

Nothing would change until and unless the members of our unit vote to ratify the contract provisions that we, your negotiating committee, will be recommending. We have scheduled an initial informational meeting for 3:30 p.m. tomorrow, Friday, Jan. 15 at the Crown Plaza Hotel. We will meet in the Kellogg Room on the first floor. We plan to schedule a vote on Friday, Jan. 22; additional details will follow. Your negotiating committee members will be available to discuss these issues any time before the vote.

The company held firm to a demand that we meet their needs for financial relief. They eventually agreed to our demand that any cuts be tied to a no-layoff agreement. The Guild’s analysis of the newspaper’s financial records showed severe financial stress triggered both by the continuing revenue decline and by the debt incurred during the Media News purchase of the Pioneer Press. We were told to expect 25 or 26 immediate layoffs if no agreement was reached.

We tried, as much as possible, to make the cuts equitable, and not to impact one group of workers more than another. We sought, and believe we succeeded, to trade time off for pay, rather than merely taking a direct pay cut. In that vein we succeeded in preserving the hourly wage rate, night differential, step increases and merit pay, but we lost the company’s 401k contribution, which does disproportionately affect some of us more than others.

Here are the provisions of the tentative agreement:

JOB SECURITY – The company will not lay off any Guild members through the last payroll period before Feb. 1, 2011.

SHORTER WEEK – The agreement provides for a 37.5-hour work week. That means Guild members lose 2.5 hours of pay per week, or about 6.25 percent per year. If you work more than 37.5 hours, you would be paid straight time up to 40 hours, and then overtime would kick in. Our 40-hour week would “snap back” at the end of the last payroll period before Feb. 1, 2011, the same time that layoff protection ends.

ONE FURLOUGH WEEK – Guild members must take one unpaid week between July 1 to Dec. 31 of this year, under the same terms as last year’s furlough.

FROZEN 401K CONTRIBUTION – The company’s match to our 401k contributions, now pegged at up to 3 percent, would end if this agreement is approved. That means employees can continue to save in the Media News 401k plan, but the company will not provide any match.

NO PAY HIKE – A 3 percent across-the-board pay increase, negotiated to take effect in July as part of our current contract, is lost.

NOVEMBER UPDATE – We agree to meet again with the company in November, without committing to any further changes in the contract.

The shortened work week amounts to a 6.25 percent pay cut, but we do get the time (albeit in small increments) in return. The furlough translates roughly to a 2 percent cut, also a trade of money for time. The pay hike that we will not be getting is 1.5 percent over half a year (3 percent over the full year.) Adding it up, we will be taking home 9-10 percent less this year than called for in the contract. But it’s also true that we will be working 8 percent fewer hours.

Once we realized that significant financial reductions were unavoidable, our goal was to protect the integrity of the newspaper by preventing further job losses. In short, we opted to take less money in order to protect jobs and the newspaper. We realize it is a difficult choice but we think, on balance, it is the best — or the least bad — option.

Gayle Grundtner
Sandy Kelch
Meggen Lindsay
Jim Ragsdale
Greg Sundeen

Recommended articles