Facebook advertising: Marketing vs. stalking?

shutterstock_197767223

As search and marketing evolve, new advances – particularly Facebook’s recent re-launch of its Atlas ad platform, which measures ad campaigns across screens and allows brands to target real people across mobile and the web – pose questions like how much is too much tracking, and how will consumers react to brands becoming more targeted in their marketing efforts? With careful targeting, tracking, and second screen integration, brands can easily nurture their relationships with customers.

However, at some point, will consumers equate marketing to stalking?

Advertising is often the first point of contact between brands and customers, and advertisers need to be careful about targeting too narrowly. The temptation is certainly ripe. Unlike TV and print marketing, where broad brand messages are ideal, appropriately targeting all possible demographics in one fell swoop is entirely possible online. With search, brands can target a specific set of customers on Google, a different set on Facebook, and even another set on their mobile platform. With the availability of all these different platforms, brands can easily fall victim to overly diversifying platform experiences.

While your brand should certainly hone its specific ad text for each platform, make sure that the underlying brand message is uniform across all mediums, platforms, and devices. Optimize your paid and natural search keywords and landing pages with the same core messaging, in case someone sees your Facebook ad, followed by your TV ad, and then visits your site via natural search.

Furthermore, knowing exactly how to target your audience may well be on its way to becoming easier, and Facebook may be change’s key facilitator. As previously mentioned, Facebook has re-launched its Atlas ad platform, now making ad purchasing on non-Facebook owned properties possible. Facebook is already essentially already a data provider – you can use its rich source of audience data for your marketing needs (as long as you are buying Facebook inventory). But, if Facebook does indeed follow the path trekked by other data providers out there (like BlueKai, eXcelate, etc.), they will start allowing advertisers to buy audience data through other exchanges or DSP’s like DoubleClick Bid Manager.   

This move makes sense for Facebook, as marketers are constantly searching for the most descriptive information available about their target audiences, and Facebook generates just that. This kind of deep data has a higher potential for accuracy than buying audience segments that are based on assumptions. Keeping these blossoming opportunities in mind, here are three tips to help marketers successfully walk that increasingly fine line between marketing and stalking:

Retarget Wisely

It’s imperative to exercise both caution and transparency when setting up data generating tools. Be careful when setting up your retargeting audience lists. Set list durations based on your average sales cycle, or average time it takes a consumer to take the final desired action. By default, many audience lists are set for 30 days, while larger commitment conversions or purchase cycles may require 60 – 90 days before the decision is made.

If your customer has not converted in 90 days, they have either chosen a different brand/service provider or decided not to buy your product and will probably feel turned off by a brand’s continued contact.

Do not hit that customer with the same ad all over the web for weeks, or even days. A few appearances of a remarketing campaign after a consumer’s initially unsuccessful brand site visit might bring that consumer back for more, but eventually, these instances should taper off. Make sure to also use a negative converted audience list to filter out all consumers who have already bought or registered for your product/service. Customers have become acutely aware of when and how they are tracked, and if it’s overdone, will start to feel stalked.