Using Behavioral Economics in Digital Marketing to Entice Consumers

According to the 4 types of cognitive biases

The field of behavioral economics received increased attention from both media and marketers when U.S. academic Richard Thaler won the Nobel Prize in economics in 2017 for incorporating psychological assumptions into analyses of economic decision-making.

Cognitive biases have been used in marketing for a long time, often unknowingly. As engagement with customers increasingly moves online, cognitive biases offer new opportunities for marketers.

There are many cognitive biases, and below we have selected four to discuss how they are being or could be used with great effect online.

Decision paralysis

Is more choice always an advantage? It might not be. Researchers have found that when faced with too many options, we are unable to evaluate them all and, overwhelmed by choice, we might choose not to choose. With this in mind, it is not surprising that Tesco, the U.K.’s biggest retailer, recently decided to remove about one third of the 90,000 products available on its shelves in reaction to the increasing market shares of discounters offering 2,000 to 3,000 products.

Ecommerce brands have an advantage over brick-and-mortar supermarkets. Instead of reducing the number of products they offer, they can help the shopper overcome decision paralysis by making the search for the right product as easy as possible. To help its customer find the right accommodation, for instance, Airbnb offers a wide range of filters according to price, number of beds, amenities offered, etc.

There is a fine line between using behavioral economics to improve customer’s experience and using it to manipulate consumers.

Scarcity principle

People are motivated by shortage: the rarer or more difficult a product or an offer is to obtain, the more valuable it becomes in consumers’ eyes.

In brick-and-mortar stores where stock can be visible, it is easier to demonstrate a shortage. Yet online retailers have been creative in how they tap into this bias by communicating scarcity with real-time numbers, such as limited quantities or a narrow window of time. shows the number of hotel rooms left at a certain price, while clothing outlet Zalando Lounge limits the validity of items in the basket to 20 minutes before removing them.

Endowment effect

The endowment effect occurs when we overvalue something that we own and become reluctant to part with it. People are often willing to pay more to keep something they feel they already own while new customers will be less inclined to pay the same price.

The endowment effect is a cornerstone of new business models, such as Stitch Fix, an online styling service. Based on a detailed customer style profile, the startup mails a selection of clothing, shoes and accessories. The customer can try on the items at home, keep what they like and send back the rest. This is where the endowment effect kicks in: Once the customer has received and tried the items, they feel a sense of attachment and will be more likely to keep them.

Decoy effect

The decoy effect is a phenomenon whereby consumers will tend to have a change in preference between two options when presented with a third option that is less desirable. Therefore, by presenting customers with additional choices, marketers can guide customers toward the option they want them to take.

UPC, a Swiss internet provider, added a third option to its choice of internet packages. Once the decoy “Happy home 50,” with 50 Mbit per second for $.99- per month was introduced, the more expensive of two other initial options looked much more interesting.

So, is this good or bad?

As with any other marketing tool, there is a fine line between using behavioral economics to improve customer’s experience and using it to manipulate consumers.

Indeed, the way marketers use cognitive biases does not always lead to added value for the customer. One example how not to apply behavioral economics comes from Uber. The car-sharing company has been using behavioral economics to influence its drivers’ behavior, inducing them to work longer hours, sometimes at hours or locations that were less lucrative for them.

To help marketers and policymakers remain on an ethical path, Thaler has identified these principles that should guide marketers or policymakers when applying cognitive biases: transparence, which says that nudges should never be misleading; ease to opt out, where the customer should be able to easily opt out of an option; and benefit, where the measure should aim at improving the welfare of those being nudged.

If marketers follow these principles, there is a great opportunity to apply behavioral economics in online retail to create real win-win situations and better customer experiences.