Thumbs Down on Corporate Green Efforts

The corporate sector has gone to great lengths in recent years to persuade consumers of its commitment to environmental sustainability. But consumers aren’t buying it, to judge by the results of a study released this month by Gibbs & Soell Public Relations. Nor, for that matter, do corporate executives — queried in a parallel survey — necessarily think companies are deeply committed to going green.

In polling for the Gibbs & Soell Sense & Sustainability Study, fielded in July by Harris Interactive, just 16 percent of consumers said they believe most or all businesses “are committed to ‘going green’ — that is, improving the health of the environment by implementing more sustainable business practices and/or offering environmentally friendly products or services.” Forty-eight percent said “some” companies have such a commitment, while 24 percent said it’s true of “a few” and 1 percent that it’s true of “none.” (The rest weren’t sure one way or another.)

Is this merely a case of consumers taking a free shot at the seldom-loved corporate sector? It’s harder to dismiss the consumer findings in that fashion when you look at the responses gathered among executives at Fortune 1000 companies. Even among these respondents, just 29 percent expressed agreement that most or all businesses are committed to going green. Fifty-four percent said “some” and 15 percent said “a few” have such a commitment.

Then again, the executives pin some responsibility for this on consumers. When asked to identify “the barriers, if any, to more businesses ‘going green,'” 71 percent of the survey’s executives cited “consumers’ unwillingness to pay a premium for green products or services.” That put this factor second only to “not enough return on investment” (cited by 78 percent of the executives) and well ahead of “lack of commitment from senior leadership” (34 percent) and “internal opposition or lack of consensus” (20 percent).

Consumers often affirm their own willingness to adopt “sustainable” behavior as shoppers, but corporate executives have their doubts about what this amounts to in practice. “While surveys consistently show consumers have a preference, and even a willingness to pay a premium, for green products, the question is often asked without the full context of performance and convenience,” notes Ron Loch, senior vp for greentech & sustainability at Gibbs & Soell. “I believe executives feel that at the point of purchase, performance and convenience trump sustainability for most consumers. If there is at least parity, then ‘green’ can be an effective differentiator for which consumers may even pay a slight premium. If the product doesn’t deliver the desired results or requires additional steps or equipment, then it probably won’t succeed regardless of how green it is.” 

When companies have taken steps to make their products and services environmentally sound, they naturally want to brag about it. But this can be a trap if not done carefully. “I think the important message for marketers is that they can’t let enthusiasm for promoting green features and benefits result in not talking enough about the product’s performance,” says Loch. “Consumers care about the environment, but they are skeptical and pragmatic. They still need to understand the full value proposition before they’re going to shell out their hard-earned dollars.”

Companies aren’t eager to lay out their own hard-earned dollars if they’re not sure of a payback, and this is reflected in staffing (or lack thereof) devoted to initiatives in sustainability. More than two-thirds of the executives said their company has people who are responsible for sustainability, but “most have merely added green efforts to the primary duties of a team, or C-suite or senior-level position.” Just 25 percent of the executives said their own company has a high-level person or a team “specifically/solely dedicated to sustainability and/or ‘going green.'” Even in companies with 10,000-plus employees, the figure is a lackluster 31 percent.