Are low-sugar cereals really better for you?

Inspiration meets innovation at Brandweek, the ultimate marketing experience. Join industry luminaries, rising talent and strategic experts in Phoenix, Arizona this September 23–26 to assess challenges, develop solutions and create new pathways for growth. Register early to save.

Stop the presses—a new Associated Press study says experts who have examined the spate of new lower-sugar versions of breakfast cereals found they have no more significant nutritional value than their full-sugar counterparts. In fact, they have nearly identical amounts of calories, fat, salt and chemical preservatives. AP says execs at General Mills, Kellogg’s and Post were at a loss to explain why the reduced-sugar cereals were the better choice. (Not that they were shy about suggesting health benefits, with the lower-sugar claim printed on boxes in type that is nearly as large as the product names.)

AW+

WORK SMARTER - LEARN, GROW AND BE INSPIRED.

Subscribe today!

To Read the Full Story Become an Adweek+ Subscriber

View Subscription Options

Already a member? Sign in