New YORK--Claiming that arbitrators failed to consider all the evidence it presented

Inspiration meets innovation at Brandweek, the ultimate marketing experience. Join industry luminaries, rising talent and strategic experts in Phoenix, Arizona this September 23–26 to assess challenges, develop solutions and create new pathways for growth. Register early to save.

New YORK–Claiming that arbitrators failed to consider all the evidence it presented, Interpublic Group of Cos. is seeking to overturn an arbitration panel decision that deemed “unpersuasive” IPG’s claims that former Lowe & Partners/SMS chairman Marvin Sloves “tortiously interfered” with Lowe’s relationship with Mercedes-Benz, thereby causing a split.
“The basic appeal is that they didn’t rule on [all] the arguments that we gave,” IPG general counsel Nick Camera said. “The whole ruling was [based on] one small part” of the case.
The decision does refer to “other contentions raised by IPG relating to alleged acts of disloyalty by Mr.

AW+

WORK SMARTER - LEARN, GROW AND BE INSPIRED.

Subscribe today!

To Read the Full Story Become an Adweek+ Subscriber

View Subscription Options

Already a member? Sign in