|
News > Client
Airborne, FTC Reach SettlementCompany agrees to pay up to $30 million to settle case over the advertising and labeling of its productsAug 14, 2008 ![]() Airborne has denied wrongdoing or illegal conduct. According to the FTC, Airborne, Bonita Springs, Fla., "Has agreed to pay up to $30 million to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that it did not have adequate evidence to support its advertising claims in which its effervescent tablet was marketed as a cold prevention and treatment remedy." Airborne has denied wrongdoing or illegal conduct, but reached an agreement with the FTC and agreed to settle a class action lawsuit "to avoid continued expense and distraction from management of the business," according to a statement released by the company. The FTC's complaint stated that there was "no competent and reliable scientific evidence to support the claims made by the [company] that Airborne tablets can prevent or reduce the risk of colds, sickness, or infection; protect against or help fight germs; reduce the severity or duration of a cold; and protect against colds, sickness, or infection in crowded places such as airplanes, offices or schools." The FTC complaint also stated company founders Victoria Knight-McDowell and Thomas John McDowell,"made false claims that Airborne products are clinically proven to treat colds." In a statement, Airborne CEO Elise Donahue said: "Consumers can feel confident that the advertising and labeling going into the marketplace accurately reflects what Airborne products do. Our products help support the immune system . . . [Airborne] continues to be the No. 1-selling immune support dietary supplement, and we're very proud of this fact." Donahue stressed: "It's important to note that this is a settlement over older advertising and labeling and has nothing to do with public safety. We've offered a money-back guarantee for our products since 1997 and we have millions of satisfied customers." The FTC said: "In addition to prohibiting the defendants from making claims that are false, misleading, or unsubstantiated by competent and reliable scientific evidence, and providing additional funds for consumer redress, the [settlement] authorizes the [FTC] to monitor the defendants' compliance with the order." Airborne, FTC Reach SettlementCompany agrees to pay up to $30 million to settle case over the advertising and labeling of its productsAug 14, 2008 ![]() Airborne has denied wrongdoing or illegal conduct. According to the FTC, Airborne, Bonita Springs, Fla., "Has agreed to pay up to $30 million to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that it did not have adequate evidence to support its advertising claims in which its effervescent tablet was marketed as a cold prevention and treatment remedy." Airborne has denied wrongdoing or illegal conduct, but reached an agreement with the FTC and agreed to settle a class action lawsuit "to avoid continued expense and distraction from management of the business," according to a statement released by the company. The FTC's complaint stated that there was "no competent and reliable scientific evidence to support the claims made by the [company] that Airborne tablets can prevent or reduce the risk of colds, sickness, or infection; protect against or help fight germs; reduce the severity or duration of a cold; and protect against colds, sickness, or infection in crowded places such as airplanes, offices or schools." The FTC complaint also stated company founders Victoria Knight-McDowell and Thomas John McDowell,"made false claims that Airborne products are clinically proven to treat colds." In a statement, Airborne CEO Elise Donahue said: "Consumers can feel confident that the advertising and labeling going into the marketplace accurately reflects what Airborne products do. Our products help support the immune system . . . [Airborne] continues to be the No. 1-selling immune support dietary supplement, and we're very proud of this fact." Donahue stressed: "It's important to note that this is a settlement over older advertising and labeling and has nothing to do with public safety. We've offered a money-back guarantee for our products since 1997 and we have millions of satisfied customers." The FTC said: "In addition to prohibiting the defendants from making claims that are false, misleading, or unsubstantiated by competent and reliable scientific evidence, and providing additional funds for consumer redress, the [settlement] authorizes the [FTC] to monitor the defendants' compliance with the order."
Other Client News
|
ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT |
||||||||||


Share on LinkedIn








