Data Center > Adweek/Linkedin Polls
SaveE-mailPrintMost PopularRSSReprints

Tough Times Call for Reasons to Spend

Polling for AdweekMedia among LinkedIn members points to maintaining share of mind

June 4, 2009

- Mark Dolliver


adweek/photos/stylus/86872-money-man.jpg
NEW YORK It's an article of faith among people in the agency business that ad and marketing budgets should be maintained in tough economic times so a brand can keep up its equity, grab share from less-enlightened competitors, reassure jittery consumers, etc., etc.

Alas, their clients often fail to share this outlook, which is why we've seen budgets getting sliced and diced in the past year. But how does a broader business-oriented audience feel about the matter? We get a sense of this from polling conducted for AdweekMedia among members of LinkedIn.

A multiple-choice question, posed in online polling conducted in late April and May, asked respondents to complete a statement that began: "Ad and marketing budgets should be maintained in tough times because...." The choices were: "It's an opportunity to win mindshare," "It's even more important to win sales," "Big payback will come later" and "They should be cut, cut, cut."

Ad-agency readers will be glad to learn that just 3 percent of respondents opted for the "cut, cut, cut" option. A plurality (42 percent) went for the "opportunity to win mindshare" theory, slightly outnumbering those who adopted the "important to win sales" outlook (37 percent). Fewer (16 percent) favored maintaining budgets in hopes of a later "big payback." (See here for the full results of that polling, and go here to participate in another ad-related LinkedIn poll for AdweekMedia.)

Living up to their green-eyeshade stereotype, respondents in finance jobs were the most likely to pick the "cut, cut, cut" answer, with 13 percent doing so. Respondents in creative jobs gave a modestly above-average proportion of their votes to the "win mindshare" answer (47 percent).

Though small businesses often live close to the edge, respondents who toil in such companies were the least likely to assign foremost importance to winning sales (34 percent) and the most likely to value winning mindshare (45 percent). By contrast, people who work for very large, "enterprise"-scale companies were the most likely to pick the "win sales" answer (43 percent) and the least likely to choose the "win mindshare" response (35 percent).

The views of business owners on such matters are always of interest, since they're spending what they regard as their own money on advertising and marketing. In this poll, respondents in that cohort expressed the same priorities as respondents in general. "Win mindshare" was their top answer (47 percent), followed by "win sales" (29 percent), "big payback" (22 percent) and "cut, cut, cut" (2 percent).

If you think men would be more likely than women to adopt the ruthless "cut, cut, cut" approach, you're right. But the numbers were small for both sexes, with 6 percent of the survey's men and 2 percent of the women giving that answer.


Tough Times Call for Reasons to Spend

Polling for AdweekMedia among LinkedIn members points to maintaining share of mind

June 4, 2009

- Mark Dolliver


adweek/photos/stylus/86872-money-man.jpg

NEW YORK It's an article of faith among people in the agency business that ad and marketing budgets should be maintained in tough economic times so a brand can keep up its equity, grab share from less-enlightened competitors, reassure jittery consumers, etc., etc.

Alas, their clients often fail to share this outlook, which is why we've seen budgets getting sliced and diced in the past year. But how does a broader business-oriented audience feel about the matter? We get a sense of this from polling conducted for AdweekMedia among members of LinkedIn.

A multiple-choice question, posed in online polling conducted in late April and May, asked respondents to complete a statement that began: "Ad and marketing budgets should be maintained in tough times because...." The choices were: "It's an opportunity to win mindshare," "It's even more important to win sales," "Big payback will come later" and "They should be cut, cut, cut."

Ad-agency readers will be glad to learn that just 3 percent of respondents opted for the "cut, cut, cut" option. A plurality (42 percent) went for the "opportunity to win mindshare" theory, slightly outnumbering those who adopted the "important to win sales" outlook (37 percent). Fewer (16 percent) favored maintaining budgets in hopes of a later "big payback." (See here for the full results of that polling, and go here to participate in another ad-related LinkedIn poll for AdweekMedia.)

Living up to their green-eyeshade stereotype, respondents in finance jobs were the most likely to pick the "cut, cut, cut" answer, with 13 percent doing so. Respondents in creative jobs gave a modestly above-average proportion of their votes to the "win mindshare" answer (47 percent).

Though small businesses often live close to the edge, respondents who toil in such companies were the least likely to assign foremost importance to winning sales (34 percent) and the most likely to value winning mindshare (45 percent). By contrast, people who work for very large, "enterprise"-scale companies were the most likely to pick the "win sales" answer (43 percent) and the least likely to choose the "win mindshare" response (35 percent).

The views of business owners on such matters are always of interest, since they're spending what they regard as their own money on advertising and marketing. In this poll, respondents in that cohort expressed the same priorities as respondents in general. "Win mindshare" was their top answer (47 percent), followed by "win sales" (29 percent), "big payback" (22 percent) and "cut, cut, cut" (2 percent).

If you think men would be more likely than women to adopt the ruthless "cut, cut, cut" approach, you're right. But the numbers were small for both sexes, with 6 percent of the survey's men and 2 percent of the women giving that answer.
Post a Comment
Asterisk (*) is a required field.
* Author:
* Comment:
 
The opinions expressed in comments are those of the individual poster. They do not necessarily reflect the views of Adweek or Nielsen Business Media. Attacks of a personal nature and comments that are otherwise inappropriate may be removed.


Our ProductsOur Products

ADWEEK DAILY UPDATE

Receive a comprehensive roundup of the biggest stories of the day.

BREAKING NEWS ALERTS

Sign up to be the first to hear about the biggest breaking news stories.

SUBSCRIBE

Stay connected to what's happening in the advertising industry with delivery of the print edition and complete online access.


ADWEEK POLL



Adweek Advertising Home | Advertising Industry News | Creative TV Advertising | Advertising Industry Community | Video Advertising | Advertising Data Center | Advertising Special Reports | Advertising Careers | Advertising Products | Advertising About Us | Advertising Business Statements | Advertising Contact Us | Advertising Opportunities | Ad Licensing | Advertiser FAQ | Advertising Magazine Subscriptions | Subscriber FAQs | Advertising News RSS | Online Ad Site Map | Mobile

© 2009 Nielsen Business Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms of Use  |   Privacy Policy