Advertising's new wrinkle

Wrinkles_2Splenda’s under fire for calling itself sugar, Blockbuster for promoting its end to late fees, and McDonald’s for not advertising how unhealthy its food can actually be. Is there a new movement growing to put truth in advertising? A category rife for the picking is the $29 billion beauty industry, which spends about $6 billion in the U.S. to advertise all sorts of cosmetics, creams and perfumes. Wrinkles can be “prevented” or “disappear” in a day, sometimes even faster, spider veins can fade and cellulite reduced. It seems beauty products, from cheap store brands to luxury bottles, are making loftier claims every day. Maybe the products are actually getting better and we are getting closer to creating a real fountain of youth. But talk to a dermatologist and they’ll likely tell you most of the products can do none of the miracle work their packaging and advertising claim. And the fancy botanicals and scientific-sounding extras hardly make the difference. Funny thing is that most women I know still buy the product with the loftier price tag. Sometimes when it comes to aging, denial is the way to go, or at least—when it comes to advertising—fudging the truth.

—Posted by Eleftheria Parpis

Get the The AdFreak Daily newsletter:

Thanks for signing up! Check your inbox for a confirmation email.

Topics: Parpis

Sign up for AdFreak Newsletters

About AdFreak

AdFreak is a daily blog of the best and worst of creativity in advertising, media, marketing and design. Follow us as we celebrate (and skewer) the latest, greatest, quirkiest and freakiest commercials, promos, trailers, posters, billboards, logos and package designs around. Edited by Adweek's Tim Nudd.

Click to Subscribe to AdFreak RSS